Vol2. Evolution and Future Prospects of Limiter Technology in Tokamaks: From Solid Materials to Liquid Metal Innovations

Tokamaks, the most prominent devices for magnetically confined fusion, require precise control over plasma behavior to achieve optimal performance and minimize damage to in-vessel components. Among these components, limiters play a crucial role by defining the plasma boundary, protecting the vacuum vessel, and managing heat flux during non-diverted operational phases. The evolution of limiters has paralleled the advancements in tokamak technology, from early designs utilizing high-Z materials like steel and molybdenum to contemporary solutions employing low-Z materials such as graphite and beryllium [1-3].
The increasing power density and improved confinement capabilities of modern tokamaks necessitated advancements in limiter technology to handle higher heat loads and reduce impurity contamination. This led to the development of pump limiters, which enable efficient particle removal, and magnetic limiters, which employ electromagnetic fields to control plasma behavior at the edge. However, as tokamaks continue to evolve toward longer pulse lengths and higher performance regimes, solid material limiters face challenges such as surface erosion and impurity release [4, 5].
Liquid metal limiters have emerged as a promising alternative, offering self-regenerating surfaces and enhanced heat dissipation capabilities. Liquid lithium, in particular, has shown potential to improve plasma performance by reducing impurity levels and enhancing energy confinement. Recent experiments with liquid metal limiters in devices like FTU, T-11M, and EAST have demonstrated significant benefits, including reduced recycling, improved plasma stability, and the potential for higher heat flux handling [6, 7].
This study examines the evolution, present advancements, and future potential of limiter technology in tokamak systems, with a focus on the transition from solid to liquid metal limiters. The challenges and opportunities associated with these advancements are discussed, emphasizing their critical role in the ongoing pursuit of sustainable fusion energy.

One of the most critical in-vessel components of a tokamak being limiter has gone through extensive research and development in the past decades. During the normal operation i.e., diverted configuration maximum heat flux is handled by the divertor target plates specifically designed for this purpose. However, during the startup and shutdown phase, until diverter configuration is achieved the plasma must refrain from coming into contact with the walls of vacuum vessel. Limiters in tokamaks thus serve the purpose of shaping the plasma edge as well as preventing direct contact of plasma with walls of vacuum vessel during normal and off normal events such as disruptions [8-10].
Global interest in the limiter spiked after its successful operation in Soviet T-3 tokamak in late 1960’s leading to cleaner plasma with unexpectedly long confinement time. During that period, limiters were constructed from diaphragms and rails composed of steel and molybdenum, with their plasma-facing surfaces experiencing significant heating due to the applied heat flux. However, as the tokamak progressed towards stronger and more stable magnetic confinement the corresponding heat loads also increased. Higher heat loads resulted in higher limiter temperature and also higher sputtering yield. Consequently, to prevent core plasma contamination from high-Z impurities, the limiter materials were restricted to low-Z elements like graphite and beryllium [11, 12].
Another method of lowering the impurity content resulting from sputtering is by using magnetic limiters such as a helical magnetic limiter. This limiter employs electromagnetic coils to generate a helical magnetic field, which interacts with the edge plasma to form a boundary layer, effectively inhibiting the further movement of the edge plasma towards the first wall. Moreover, the helical magnetic field spreads the plasma particles over a larger volume, thereby promoting convective cooling. The boundary layer thus produced prevents ingress of impurities into the core plasma. Nevertheless, the limiters using physical material boundaries remained of grater interest as compared to magnetic limiters mainly because of simpler design and easier manufacturing [13-15].
The need to efficiently removal particles from the plasma lead to the development of pump limiter. The ideal gas pumping law states that, Q = S*P. Where Q is the gas throughput representing the amount particles being removed from the system per unit time, S is the pumping speed indicating how quickly the pumping system can remove gas and P is the neutral gas pressure injected at the edge of the plasma. Increasing the pressure means there are more neutral gas particles available for interaction with plasma. Based on this law, increasing neutral pressure is determined to be economically and geometrically favorable as compared to increasing pumping speed for higher gas throughput. In this context, a pump limiter under Advanced Limiter Test (ALT-1) program was comprehensively studied on TEXTOR. The study utilized a fixed as well as variable pump limiter. The fixed geometry limiter utilizes a fixed stainless-steel head and neutralizer plate proving a fixed inlet for the particles. While variable geometry limiter uses a graphite head and allows for changing the throat length and width of pumping duct. Thus, the fixed geometry limiter is utilized for low recycling regime only while variable geometry limiter can be adjusted for different operation regimes [16-19].
In late 1986, ALT II program extending the ALT I concept to complete toroidal geometry through a toroidal belt pump limiter was initiated on TEXTOR tokamak [20]. The graphite limiter blade, having an area of 3.4 m², was specifically designed to withstand plasma heating loads of up to 4 MW for durations of 3 to 4 seconds. It was equipped with an eight-port plasma exhaust system, designed to extract 5-10% of the core plasma efflux, meeting the specifications required for steady-state D-T reactors. Positioned at the low field side (LFS), the eight adjustable blades intercepted a significant fraction of the power and particle flow, constructed from INCONEL 625 and incorporating 28 graphite tiles. Power removal was quantitatively assessed using infrared thermography, while electrical fields were applied to optimize particle exhaust in the scrape-off layer (SOL). Ultimately, the ALT-II configuration provided a critical foundation for achieving high confinement modes and effectively managing neon radiation at the plasma boundary [21-24].
Recently liquid lithium has gained popularity as the first wall material. Research indicates that a non-recycling liquid lithium boundary could provide access to unique tokamak equilibria. In CDX-U, initial experiments utilized a rail limiter, which was later replaced by a heated stainless-steel tray to expose a larger lithium surface to the plasma. The tray was specifically designed to mitigate inductive currents by ensuring alignment with the magnetic field, thereby optimizing plasma performance. Following preliminary tests with solid lithium, a new injection system was implemented to deliver liquid lithium uniformly across the preheated tray, resulting in complete coverage and marked improvements in impurity levels and plasma behavior. The benefits of surfaces with low or non-recycling conditions were also demonstrated in experiments like DOLLOP in the TFTR, though complications such as lithium intercalation into graphite were observed. Later investigations in the tokamaks such as T-11M used a capillary porous rail limiter, which established a ‘self-replenishing’ liquid lithium surface. To minimize lithium evaporation and undesirable coatings, it was found that maintaining the tray at temperatures of 300°C or higher during discharges is essential for stable tokamak operation [25-29].
The Frascati Tokamak Upgrade (FTU) launched experimental programs utilizing a liquid lithium limiter (LLL) with a capillary porous system (CPS) to explore the potential of liquid metals as plasma facing materials. This approach led to reduction in recycling, producing exceptionally clean plasmas where only lithium emission lines were detected in the UV spectra. Furthermore, lithization—applying a thin lithium layer to the inner wall—reduced plasma instabilities and enhanced performance metrics, such as energy confinement time and stored energy. The LLL demonstrated its resilience to significant thermal loads, with future plans aiming to incorporate actively cooled systems to enhance its operational lifespan [30-33].
As solid materials like tungsten have proven inadequate for PFCs under expected conditions. Recent research has concentrated on the potential of liquid metals, particularly within CPS, as promising candidates for PFCs. The tin liquid limiter (TLL), currently under development for the FTU tokamak, aims to operate at incident fluxes of up to 10 MW/m² while maintaining a stable temperature range of 300–900 °C. Liquid tin (Sn) emerged as a promising alternative to liquid lithium due to its lower chemical erosion and higher boiling point, allowing for greater operational limits and heat load resistance. This design of TLL incorporated a CPS made from tungsten felt and featured an in-vessel plasma-facing element equipped with heating and cooling systems to maintain the liquid state of Sn. Preliminary testing was successfully completed till 2015, marking a significant upgrade in FTU’s experimental capabilities [34-37].
The use of liquid lithium has addressed several challenges associated with the long-term use of PFCs in tokamaks, including surface damage, material degradation, plasma contamination, and tritium retention. A comparative analysis of matrix materials for lithium-based capillary porous systems (CPS) showed that tungsten fiber materials, particularly felt, were preferable due to their superior thermal shock resistance, thermal conductivity, and corrosion resistance compared to stainless steel. The development of an advanced CPS design incorporated an outer layer with pore sizes ranging from 20 to 100 μm and an inner layer containing 200 μm channels, increasing capillary pressure and facilitating efficient lithium flow [38-42].
Successful applications of lithium as a PFM were reported in several devices, including TFTR, where lithium pellet injection enhanced energy confinement and D-T fusion power, and in TJ-II and NSTX, where lithium coatings improved performance and reduced the H-mode power threshold. In HT-7, experiments initiated in 2009 utilized various lithium limiter designs, culminating in the autumn 2012 campaign that employed flowing liquid lithium limiters. These experiments marked a significant advancement toward developing a flowing liquid lithium (FLiLi) system for long-pulse plasmas. The tests demonstrated compatibility with strong magnetic fields and achieved lower hydrogen recycling and impurity levels, resulting in improved plasma confinement. Techniques for liquid lithium injection were refined, with one approach utilizing a distributor driven by argon pressure to manage flow speed. However, challenges such as lithium wetting, and emissions needed addressing for further optimization [43-46].
Up till recently liquid lithium experiments have been conducted on various tokamaks, demonstrating its advantages over solid lithium, such as surface regeneration capabilities. Based on experiences gained from HT-7, the FLiLi limiter was developed and tested for EAST tokamak in 2014, featuring a higher lithium flow velocity and improved heat flux resistance. Designed for easy maintenance, the FLiLi limiter included an exchange box for convenient assembly and outgassing. The system specifications targeted a mass flow rate exceeding 2 cm³/s and a compact design for maintainability. The updated EAST FLiLi limiter system, which enhanced safety and performance, was successfully installed and tested during the 2016 campaign, confirming the potential of liquid lithium for future fusion applications [47-50].
In summary, the research and development of limiters in tokamaks have undergone significant advancements, evolving from early solid materials like steel and molybdenum to modern liquid metal systems. This progression has been driven by the need to address challenges related to heat flux management, plasma contamination, and long-term sustainability of plasma-facing components. Various designs, including magnetic limiters, pump limiters, and capillary porous systems using liquid lithium and tin, have demonstrated the potential for enhanced plasma performance, cleaner confinement, and better durability under extreme conditions. As fusion technology progresses, the knowledge gained from these advancements will play a pivotal role in the design of future PFCs, thereby contributing significantly to the realization of fusion as a sustainable energy source.

Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS)

1. [1] S. U. D. Khan, Z. Almutairi, M. Alanazi, and S. U. D. Khan, “Safety analysis of pool‐type double containment of system‐integrated modular advanced reactor: a case study for Saudi Arabia,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 12047 12058, 2021.
   [2] S. D. Khan et al., “Development and techno economic analysis of small modular nuclear reactor and desalination system across Middle East and North Africa region,” Desalination, vol. 406, pp. 51 59, 2017.
   [3] K. Javid, S. Khan, S. D. Khan, and A. Afzal, “Slip and chemical reaction effects on the peristaltic rheology of a viscoplastic liquid in different wave frames: application of a high permeability medium,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 1 28, 2024.
   [4] S. D. Khan, Y. Song, and S. D. Khan, “Thermal hydraulic analysis of China fusion engineering test reactor during thermal quenching by comparative approach of Relap5 and THEATRe codes,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 30, no. 30, p. 1650357, 2016.
   [5] S. U. D. Khan, M. Peng, and S. U. D. Khan, “Neutronics and thermal hydraulic coupling analysis of integrated pressurized water reactor,” International journal of energy research, vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 1709
   1717, 2013.
   [6] S. U. Khan, M. Peng, S. U. Khan, K. Ahmad, and S. N. Danish, “Simulation of Normal/Abnormal Operational Conditions of Integral Pressurized Water Reactor by Using RELAP5/MOD3. 4,” International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 229 236, 2012.
   [7] S. Shakir et al., “Optimization of ECR assisted pre ionization in GLAST III via Multiphysics simulation,” Kerntechnik, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 438 447, 2024.
   [8] S. D. Khan et al., “Cost Effective Microwave Assisted ECR Heating Using Combination of Quasi Locked Low Power Magnetrons on GLAST III,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2024.
   [9] M. Abdullah et al., “Optimization of Wall Conditioning Techniques on the MT II Tokamak,” Fusion Science and Technology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 731 740, 2024.
   [10] C. Ruset et al., “Tungsten coatings deposited on CFC tiles by the combined magnetron sputtering and ion implantation technique,” Physica Scripta, vol. 2007, no. T128, p. 171, 2007.
   [11] S. Ud Din Khan et al., “Determination of limiter design and material composition of MT II spherical tokamak,” Kerntechnik, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 54 62, 2023.
   [12] S. D. Khan, S. O. Alaswad, Y. Song, S. Hussain, and R. Khan, “Impurity transport and halo current effects on tungsten divertor system,” Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 309
   317, 2020.
   [13] S. D. Khan, R. Khan, and S. Hussain, “Suitability of thermal plasma for solid waste treatment and non
   thermal plasma for nano scale high tech plasmonic materials: a concise review,” Applied Nanoscience, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 3111 3126, 2022.
   [14] S. D. Khan, I. Wazeer, Z. Almutairi, and S. D. Khan, “Technical assessment of 10 MW solar thermal plant using nano fluids and molten salts: A case study of Saudi Arabia,” Applied Nanoscience, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 3621 3628, 2022.
   [15] S. Ud Din Khan, Y. Song, and S. Ud Din Khan, “Theoretical Calculation and Simulation Studies of Axisymmetric Plasma and Halo Current Analysis in EAST,” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, vol. 114, no. 1, 2016.
   [16] S. U. D. Khan, Y. Song, J. Zheng, S. Shi, and S. D. Khan, “Development and verification of mathematical model for halo current in ITER,” in 2015 IEEE 26th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE), 2015: IEEE, pp. 1 4.
   [17] S. U. D. Khan, Y. Song, and S. U. D. Khan, “Theoretical investigation of plasma dynamical behavior and halo current analysis,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 497 506, 2016.
   [18] S. D. Khan, S. D. Khan, Y. Song, and C. Dalong, “Theoretical relation between halo current plasma energy displacement/deformation in EAST,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics, vol. 12, pp. 23 31, 2018.
   [19] S. D. Khan, S. Yuntao, and S. D. Khan, “Theoretical calculation and simulation studies for sideways force on vacuum vessel during VDEs in east,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS), 2016: IEEE, pp. 1 1.
   [20] T. M. Khan et al., “Silver nanoparticle films by flowing gas atmospheric pulsed laser deposition and application to surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 44, no. 14, pp. 11443 11452, 2020.
   [21] S. D. Khan, S. D. Khan, R. Khan, Y. Song, S. Hussain, and S. Haider, “Development and verification of numerical study to calculate focal points of temperature in helium cooled ceramic blanket (HCCB) system in CFETR,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 33, no. 16, p. 1950173, 2019.
   [22] Z. M. Elqahtani, N. Alwadai, S. D. Khan, and S. D. Khan, “Physical behavior of nanoparticles enhanced PCM including transient conduction,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 37, no. 10, p. 2350091, 2023.
   [23] T. M. Khan, S. D. Khan, M. Raffi, and R. Khan, “Theoretical computational study of atmospheric DBD plasma and its utility for nanoscale biocompatible plasmonic coating,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 16, p. 5106, 2021.
   [24] T. M. Khan, S. d. Khan, S. d. Khan, A. Ahmad, and S. A. Abbasi, “A new strategy of using dielectric barrier discharge plasma in tubular geometry for surface coating and extension to biomedical application,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 91, no. 7, 2020.
   [25] K. Takeda, M. Ito, and S. Takeuchi, “Properties of coatings and applications of low pressure plasma spray,” Pure and applied chemistry, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1773 1782, 1990.
   [26] S. D. Khan, J. Wang, Y. Song, S. D. Khan, U. A. Rana, and R. Khan, “Steady state and transient analysis of novel design helium cooled ceramic blanket (HCCB) system of China fusion engineering test reactor (CFETR),” Journal of Fusion Energy, vol. 37, pp. 308 316, 2018.
   [27] C. García Rosales et al., “High heat flux loading of tungsten coatings on graphite deposited by plasma spray and physical vapor deposition,” Fusion technology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 263 276, 1997.
   [28] S. Ud Din Khan, M. Peng, S. Yuntao, S. Ud Din Khan, and S. Haider, “Simulation and Verification Studies of Reactivity Initiated Accident by Comparative approach of NK/TH coupling codes and RELAP5 code,” Atw. Internationale Zeitschrift fuer Kernenergie, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 125 130, 2017.
   [29] K. Wang, Y. Song, H. Wu, X. Wei, S. D. Khan, and Y. Cheng, “Inverse kinematics research using obstacle avoidance geometry method for EAST Articulated Maintenance Arm (EAMA),” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 119, pp. 1 11, 2017.
   [30] R. Neu et al., “Investigation of tungsten coatings on graphite and CFC,” Physica Scripta, vol. 2007, no. T128, p. 150, 2007.
   [31] W. Kassem, M. Tabbal, and M. Roumie, “Pulsed laser deposition of tungsten thin films on graphite,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 324, pp. 77 80, 2011.
   [32] S. Shi et al., “Design and implementation of storage cask system for EAST articulated inspection arm (AIA) robot,” Journal of Fusion Energy, vol. 34, pp. 711 716, 2015.
   [33] X. Wen et al., “Research of butt welding of thin wall jacket for superconducting cable and joint,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 100, pp. 269 273, 2015.
   [34] G. Antar et al., “The properties of the tungsten coating on fine grain graphite using pulsed laser deposition,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 148, p. 111261, 2019.
   [35] S. Qin et al., “A Novel Tungsten Coated Diamond Composite Design for Nuclear Fusion Applications,” Available at SSRN 4738839.
   [36] A. Shahzad, R. Ali, M. Kamran, S. D. Khan, S. D. Khan, and A. Farooq, “Axisymmetric flow with heat transfer over exponentially stretching sheet: a computational approach,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 554, p. 124242, 2020.
   [37] A. Shahzad et al., “Numerical study of axisymmetric flow and heat transfer in a liquid film over an unsteady radially stretching surface,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, no. 1, p. 6737243, 2020.
   [38] S. Khan, M. Peng, and S. Khan, “Thermal hydraulic analysis of small nuclear reactor core by using comparative approach of THEATRe and Relap5 code,” Int. J. of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology, vol. 6, pp. 271 283, 01/01 2011, doi: 10.1504/IJNEST.2011.045097.
   [39] K. Tokunaga et al., “Behavior of actively cooled mock ups with plasma sprayed tungsten coating under high heat flux conditions,” Fusion engineering and design, vol. 81, no. 1 7, pp. 133 138, 2006.
   [40] Q. Yang et al., “Development of the flowing liquid lithium limiter for EAST tokamak,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 124, pp. 179 182, 2017.
   [41] I. Smid, M. Akiba, M. Araki, S. Suzuki, and K. Satoh, “Material and design considerations for the carbon armored ITER divertor,” Japan Atomic Energy Research Inst., 1993.
   [42] N. Shaukat, A. Ahmad, B. Mohsin, R. Khan, S. D. Khan, and S. D. Khan, “Multiobjective Core Reloading Pattern Optimization of PARR‐1 Using Modified Genetic Algorithm Coupled with Monte Carlo Methods,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 1802492, 2021.
   [43] S. U. D. Khan, S. Yuntao, X. Liu, and S. U. D. Khan, “Development of theoretical model for 3D plasma energy behavior and characteristics,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 400 407, 2016.
   [44] T. Maruyama and M. Harayama, “Neutron irradiation effect on the thermal conductivity and dimensional change of graphite materials,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 195, no. 1 2, pp. 44 50, 1992.
   [45] J. Ahmed, A. Shahzad, A. Farooq, M. Kamran, S. D. Khan, and S. D. Khan, “Radiative heat transfer in Homann stagnation point flow of hybrid nanofluid,” Applied Nanoscience, vol. 10, pp. 5305 5314, 2020.
   [46] S. D. Khan, S. D. Khan, and M. Peng, “Flow blockage accident or loss of flow accident by using comparative approach of NK/TH coupling codes and RELAP5 code,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 64, pp. 311 319, 2014.
   [47] R. Giniatulin et al., “High heat flux tests of mock ups for ITER divertor application,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 39, pp. 385 391, 1998.
   [48] K. Kim et al., “Manufacturing & high heat flux testing of tungsten brazed mockups in KSTAR,” in 2015 IEEE 26th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE), 2015: IEEE, pp. 1 4.
   [49] Y. Lian et al., “Manufacturing and high heat flux testing of brazed flat type W/CuCrZr plasma facing components,” Plasma Science and Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 184, 2016.
   [50] J. Zheng et al., “Conceptual design of the CFETR toroidal field superconducting coils,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1 9, 2015.